THE ENGLISH REVIEW

London, England

July 1911

(pages 666-670)

 

The Spectator: a Reply.

 

 

THOMAS HARDY

BERNARD SHAW

FREDERIC HARRISON

CONRAD

HENRY JAMES

H. G. WELLS

R. B. CUNNINGHAME GRAHAM

FRANCIS THOMPSON

ROBERT BRIDGES

SWINBURNE

WILLIAM WATSON

YEATS

ARNOLD BENNETT

JOHN GALSWORTHY

TOLSTOI

GORKI

ANATOLE FRANCE

WAGNER

TCHEKOFF

PAUL BOURGET

MAURICE HEWLETT

LAURENCE BINYON

GEORGE MOORE

FRANK HARRIS

W. H. HUDSON

GRANVILLE BARKER

ARTHUR SYMONS

STURGE MOORE

WALTER DE LA MARE

G. LOWES DICKINSON

LEONARD HOBHOUSE

EDMUND GOSSE

C. BENSON

I. ZANGWILL

HERBERT TRENCH

HILAIRE BELLOC

VIOLET HUNT

ETHEL CLIFFORD

MRS. W. K. CLIFFORD

JOHN MASEFIELD

MAY SINCLAIR

SIDNEY LOW

NEIL LYONS

RICHARD WHITEING

FORD MADDOX HUEFFER

WILFRED SCAWEN BLUNT

STEPHEN PHILLIPS

WILLIAM H. DAVIES

VERNON LEE

C. F. CLEARY

GILBERT CANNAN

MAURICE BARING

MARGARET L. WOODS

RICHARD MIDDLETON

EDWARD THOMAS

R. A. SCOTT-JAMES

FILSON YOUNG

FREDERIC MANNING

FORREST REID

STEPHEN REYNOLDS

LADY MARGARET SACKVILLE

THE DUCHESS OF SUTHERLAND

G. S. STREET

ALEISTER CROWLEY

SYDNEY BROOKS

UNA BIRCH

FRANCIS GRIERSON

FREDERICK NIVEN

MRS. BELLOC LOWNDES

LAURENCE HOUSMAN

HAROLD COX

EDEN PHILLPOTTS

A. A. HALL, F.R.S.

M. P. WILLCOCKS

YOSHIO MARKINO

SIR GILBERT PARKER, M.P.

WALTER WHITEHEAD, F.R.C.S., F.R.S.

NORMAN DOUGLAS

FLORA ANNIE STEELE

ELIZABETH ROBBINS

ELLA D’ARCY

SIR FRANK SWETTENHAM

CAMILLE MAUCLAIR

J. RAMSAY MACDONALD, M.P.

E. J. DILLON

PROFESSOR M. A. GEROTHWOHL, LITT.D.

DORA CLEMENT SHORTER

LORD COURTNAY

LADY WELBY

H. DE VERE STACPOOLE

D. H. LAWRENCE

HUGH WALPOLE

EDWIN PUGH

JOHN M. ROBERTSON, M.P.

H. M. HYNDMAN

E. HUTTON

 

 

In an article in the Spectator of June 10th The English Review has been accused of “dumping garbage upon the nation’s doorstep.” The above list of writers, all of whom have written for the Review during the last year and a half, constitutes the only serious answer that can be given to an attack couched in language purely journalistic and uncritical. I do not myself feel confident to judge the morality of these writers, but, of course, if Mr. St. Loe Strachey claims the right to do so it is no affair of mine.

     

Frank Harris can take care of himself. I wish only to say that the writer of the article in the Spectator, by piecing together two sentences and omitting a very important qualifying paragraph absolutely essential to the right understanding of the argument, has entirely misrepresented the writer.

     

With regard to the pamphlet about the “Great Adult Review” with the Spectator condemns, I have to say that it was withdrawn by me before the appearance of the Spectator attack, as the wording laid itself open to the very objections the Spectator has so eagerly seized upon. These objections were that by advertising ourselves as an Adult Review, where men of letters could express themselves free from the irritating degradation of editorial excision, we thereby exposed ourselves to malicious misrepresentation. To accuse us of selling garbage because we advertised the fact that our standard was not that of the schoolroom is a distortion of truth. The point is really what we sell. Now, what we sell is the best work obtainable from the writers whose names head this statement. The proof of the pie is in the eating. Our pamphlet may have been unhappily worded, but it is literary dishonesty to argue that therefore our tone is prurient. Finally, I may say that I cannot persuade our advertising manager to recognize the Spectator’s tutelage.

     

So far as the attack concerns the general tone and tendency of the Review, it is perhaps wise to point out that as we do not appeal to the young and the illiterate, therefore an organ such as ours may claim for itself the right of reasonable freedom of expression and discussion.

     

The curious attempt on the part of the Spectator to stir up ill-feeling in the Liberal Press against us is so discreditable a breach of journalistic ethics and fair play that I need not characterise it here. It reduces the attack to a simple act of persecution, nothing more.

     

The writer in the Spectator quotes a phrase of Green (whom, by the way, he misspells) in support of his claim, but Green wrote other verses, one of which begins:

 

“Mothers and guardian aunts, forbear

Your impious pains—“ etc.

 

No doubt, as he is such an important judge of literature he will remember the rest. It was Yvette Guilbert who spoke a brave and true word the other day when she talked of the English “shamefaced attitude” towards art and literature. Well, some of us may remember an illustration of du Marier in Punch some years ago, which depicted an old maid very much shocked at the sight of some bathers on the distant side of a lake. “But they are too far off to be indecent,” remarked her companion. “Not if you use a glass,” objected the old maid.

     

Exactly!

 

Austin Harrison.