THE LIVERPOOL ECHO

Liverpool, Lancashire, England

8 November 1934

(page 4)

MORE “MAGIC” DETAILS.

Invited To Make K.C. Disappear.

JUDGE AND BABY.

Mr. Crowley’s Appeal Dismissed.

More details of the magic which Mr. Aleister Crowley is alleged to have practised were given in the Court of Appeals to-day.

The appeal was dismissed.

Mr. Crowley, the author, was appealing from the judgment of Mr. Justice Swift in a libel action he brought against Miss Nina Hamnett, authoress of “Laughing Torso,” Messrs. Constable and Co., publishers, and Messrs. Charles Whittingham and Briggs, the printers.

Mr. Crowley said the book imputed to him the practise of black magic. According to him black magic was “Foul and criminal,” and he had never practised it.

The case for the respondents was that on Mr. Crowley’s admissions in the witness-box, and on statements made in his published works, he had practised a form of black magic which was “the negation of what every decent and right-minded person had ever held to be either decent or sacred.”

They also maintained that his reputation was that of a black magician.”

“SOMETHING THAT DEFAMES”

Continuing his reply for the publishers, Mr. Malcolm Hilbery, K.C., said the statements in “Laughing Torso” were not defamatory of Mr. Crowley, nor were they something that could be understood by reasonable people as damaging his reputation, “having regard to what his reputation was, the material on which he had built it, and what he had allowed it publicly to be.”

“A libel is something that defames,” said counsel. “It defames if it really diminishes the reputation a man enjoys, whatever his reputation is.”

Lord Justice Roche.—You mean that it would not be defamatory to say of the devil that he is black?

Lord Justice Slesser.—I want to know whether it was part of the plaintiff’s case that the words complained of meant not only that he had practised black magic, but that in consequence of his magic a baby had disappeared.

Mr. Hilbery said Mr. Eddy (for Mr. Crowley) opened the case in that way.

“ALL MOONSHINE”

Lord Justice Roche.—If the natural inference from the words was that a murder had been committed I don’t think that would have been followed by a reference to a goat. There would have been something about the police.

Mr. Hilbery.—It is all “moonshine.” I invited Mr. Crowley to make Mr. Hilbery disappear and I did not feel that I was in peril.

Lord Justice Slesser.—If he had done that it would certainly have been ground for a new trial.

During further argument, Lord Justice Greer said he rather gathered that answers Mr. Hilbery received concerned sex perversions and eroticism.

Counsel.—And magic.

Lord Justice Greer.—But that is not sufficient to justify a statement that he used his magic for the purpose of killing a baby.

Mr. Hilbery.—It does not say he killed a baby. Many people by conjuring might make a baby disappear.

Lord Justice Slesser.—I don’t think it could be said it was not defamatory to say that, by magic, a man had made a baby disappear.

“NOT THE MEANING”

Lord Justice Greer.—A man might be extremely erotic and yet not be a man who would use his powers to injure an infant.

Mr. Hilbery.—It was obvious that was not the meaning of the words.

Lord Justice Greer.—I think that was for the jury.

Mr. Hilbery.—Any jury would have been perverse if it came to any other conclusion.

“SAME IN ANY CASE”

Later Lord Justice Greer intimated that at the moment the view that commanded itself to the court was: “This is a case in which we can say that although the summing-up might have been different, and perhaps would have been more satisfactory if it had been more detailed, yet we are inclined to come to the conclusion that the results would necessarily have been the same however full the summing-up.

Mr. Martin O’Connor interposed to say that in view of this intimation he would not address the court on behalf of Miss Hamnett.

Mr. Eddy, in reply for Mr. Crowley, said that thought there was much to suggest that his client had practised magic, there was a vital distinction between white and black magic, The court might take cognisance of an Act or Parliament passed in 1735.

THE OLD DAYS

Lord Justice Greer.—If you go back so far as that he would probably have been burned at the stake, whether he called his magic white or black.

Mr. Hilbery.—Those days had their obvious advantages, whatever their disadvantages.

“ONLY POSSIBLE RESULT”

Lord Justice Greer, giving judgment dismissing the appeal, said the court had come to the conclusion that, though there might be something to be said in favour of the view that the summing-up was not as full as it out reasonable to have been, the only possible result in this case, having regard to the evidence and admissions of Mr. Crowley was a verdict for defendants.

“It is not a question of speculating or guessing,” continued the Lord Justice. “I, personally, have come to the conclusion that, however much the contentions of Mr. Eddy had been repeated by the Judge, the result would have been exactly the same as it was.”

Mr. Crowley had made admissions in regard to his conduct which Mr. Justice Swift described as admissions of the grossest kind he had heard in forty years’ experience at the Bar and on the bench.