Jane Wolfe Diary Entry

Tuesday, 12 April 1921

 

     

 

A.M.

 

 

12:50

[1]

I wake and the following thoughts occur to me.

Are we a Community, each contributing to the support of that Community; be it great or small, in labour or what, does not affect the question. Are we joint owners? If so, technically, is A.C. entitled to exclude anyone from the Abbey, say, in case anyone should desire to go there—except during a Cefalidian [sic] Working, for example? Is he entitled to set apart anything purchased with common funds for his own consumption, denying others?—Liquers, wines, etc., meaningless to me, I believe, than anyone else here I can raise this question.[2]

 

It might be well to face and settle, for future occasion—I should like to know at present—if this is:

 

An autocratic institution?

An A.A. organization and autocratic?

An A.C. organization and autocratic?

A Community?

 

Also, as yielding up our all, in the case of dismissal who pays transportation expenses, etc. Or, should each one here protect himself by withholding sufficient to carry him to a place of safety, should occasion arise?

 

"Tristam Shandy" till I sleep.

(P.S. Which was 3)

6:25

 

"Body immortal as well as the soul." Why not? Can matter be destroyed?

 

By the bye. Nietzsche says "obedience humiliates".

10.25

 

Again I try Yoga. I knew I needed a rest, but it must be two weeks since I stopped!

 

Well, I abide.

 

Meantime, I am attempting a study of myself. Of course, I have recognized from the beginning A.C. antagonized me—I antagonize him—the dislike is mutual. With an ocean between, it is different on my part. From one angle this is corking, an extremely wise arrangement. So, for the present, let it rest there.

 

I can pay both a compliment: strong—I almost said violent—natures are always offensive in some way. Though, as I understand mine is to be a public ministry, not the seclusion of an Abbey, say, it may be incumbent upon me at least to disguise the harshness.

 

In California none of this came up. The Ministry of Beauty, beauty of thought, beauty of action, beauty of surroundings, personal appearance and daily life, was a live thing with me. It was my rule of life, a rule which never proved irksome, never difficult. Here the reverse is the case. I want to be hateful, I want to irritate.

 

A good thing, too, when understood. Amen,

 

 

 

P.M.

 

A long walk up the hill, alone. Return and read aloud to Russell [C. F. Russell] and Shummy [Ninette Shumway] "Androcles and the Lion." Always good for a laugh.

 

 

Comment(s) by Aleister Crowley

1—Any such questions can be settles one by one as they arise. We are a Ship, and the Captain must be the sole authority for the sake of all alike. The Captain has the sole use of the sextant, despite the bosun's 'right' to hammer nails with it, because the ship's safety depends on this restriction of it to the Captain. Thus 666 reserves the absinthe, because it helps him to create scenarios whose sale will buy Ninette new clothes, and anyone also who drink it would never thereby help the Establishment of the Law. 666 never drinks it merely as a pleasure. He is now writing this obvious stuff after painting and dictating simultaneously all day, and will probably work out a new scenario all night, helped by cocaine at the risk of his health and reason, all to get money to Establish the Law. He is not grumbling at his poverty-stricken surroundings, or regretting the $300,000 he has given to the Work, or withholding one drop of his blood from the Cup of BABALON. And why shouldn't Hansi play with my colours, and your typewriter, and Lea [Leah Hirsig] grab Ninette's nipples from Lulu? SUUM CUIQUE.

2—There is also the point (See CCXX II 58) that one is entitled, [illegible] speaking to the things one has always been [illegible] to have.

 

 

[102]